To Old No. 7:
F, Daniel Alfredsson (6,000,000)
F, Shane Doan (5,320,000)
D, Sheldon Souray (1,600,000)
To Yoshi’s Cookies:
F, Teddy Purcell (1,790,000)
D, Dan Boyle (3,690,000)
Old No.7’s 2nd round pick in 2013
Old No.7’s 5th round pick in 2013
Posted Wednesday, December 7, 2011 @ 11:21PM
vet……ok….approve…lol
I’m going to see what the others vote first…seriously…for one, I don’t think the trade is fair at all. Secondly, when I compare the offers I get from you versus what you actually do end up trading in other deals, kind of ridiculous (my opinion though)…
Never mind…I approve…not important enough to veto…
Souray for Boyle is a wash or good assuming Souray gets hurt at some point. Alfredsson for Purcell is a wash for this year and an improvement for the future. Doan for a 2nd and a 5th since I would lose him for nothing and owuld be too much at 5.8M next year. All for the future.
Plus Dabramo, the deal did not start off like this. Maybe if you learned how to counter offer and negotiate, maybe we can make a trade… LOL
Trade fair for sure, not even close to being vetoed.
Boyle and souray never were, are, or will be a wash. Despite all that, approve.
approve
Approve, but Boyle and Souray a wash, that deserves a CMON MAN!
I had to say it was a wash to appease Joe as he thought I did not get enough in the trade. In reality, we know Boyle is better than Souray.
you deserve to have this trade vetoed for having the audacity to say Doan for 2 – 2013 draft picks makes sense LOL
Like I said, to appease Dabramo. I know Boyle was better and so the excess of Boyle over Souray, the excess of Purcell because of his future value over Alfredsson and to be honest, plus the picks equals Doan. Doan is good for 55-60 points but not worth keeping at 5.8M for next year.
Approve
Look at Vince using big words like audacity lol
Approve
7 approves, deal official